From 19f342f07c24cd0a62d3f5e9a65fc3e326bccd66 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alice BRENON <alice.brenon@ens-lyon.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:09:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Hopefully dotting the Is and crossing the Ts of the
 structural remarks

---
 ICHLL_Brenon.md | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ICHLL_Brenon.md b/ICHLL_Brenon.md
index c57bbbf..cc0bb88 100644
--- a/ICHLL_Brenon.md
+++ b/ICHLL_Brenon.md
@@ -298,13 +298,24 @@ contain only one word, like `<pos>adj</pos>` in the example given in the
 official documentation.
 
 Secondly, although we have seen examples of connections from this module to the
-rest of the XML-TEI, especially the *core* module (see the case of the `<ref/>`
-element above), the *dictionaries* appears somewhat isolated from important
-structural elements like `<head/>` or `<div/>`. Indeed, computing all the paths
-from either `<entry/>` or `<sense/>` elements to the latter of length shorter or
-equal to 5 by a systematic traversal of the graph yields exclusively paths
-(respectively 9042 and 39093 of them) containing either a `<floatingText/>` or
-an `<app/>` element. The first one is used to encode 
+rest of the XML-TEI, especially to the *core* module (see the case of the
+`<ref/>` element above), the *dictionaries* module appears somewhat isolated
+from important structural elements like `<head/>` or `<div/>`. Indeed, computing
+all the paths from either `<entry/>` or `<sense/>` elements to the latter of
+length shorter or equal to 5 by a systematic traversal of the graph yields
+exclusively paths (respectively 9042 and 39093 of them) containing either a
+`<floatingText/>` or an `<app/>` element. The first one, as its name aptly
+suggests, is used to encode text that doesn't quite fit the regular flow of the
+document, as for example in the context of an embedded narrative. Both examples
+displayed in the online documentation feature a `<body/>` as direct child of
+`<floatingText/>`, neatly separating its content as independent. The purpose of
+the second one, although its name — short for apparatus — is less clear, is to
+wrap together several versions of the same excerpts, for instance when there are
+several possible readings of an unclear group of words in a manuscript, or when
+the encoder is trying to compile a single version of a piece of work from
+several sources which disagree over some passage. In both case, it appears
+obvious that it is not something that is expected to occur naturally in the
+course of an article in the general case.
 
 Thus, despite a rather dense internal connectivity, the *dictionaries* module
 fails to provide encoders with a device to represent recursively nesting
@@ -381,12 +392,12 @@ attribute.
 In addition, each line within the article must start with a `<lb/>` to mark its
 begining including before the `<head/>` element, which, although a surprising
 setup, underlines the fact that in the dense layout of encyclopedias, the
-carriage return separating two articles is meaningful.  Stating each new line
-explicitly also keeps enough information to reconstruct a faithful facsimile but
-it also has the advantage of highlighting the fact than even though the
-definition is cut from the headword by being in a separate XML element, they
-still occur on the same line, which is a typographic choice usually made both in
-encyclopedias and dictionaries where space is at a premium.
+carriage return separating two articles is meaningful. Stating each new line
+explicitly keeps enough information to reconstruct a faithful facsimile but it
+also has the advantage of highlighting the fact than even though the definition
+is cut from the headword by being in a separate XML element, they still occur on
+the same line, which is a typographic choice usually made both in encyclopedias
+and dictionaries where space is at a premium.
 
 Finally, the various sections and sub-sections occurring within the article body
 may be nested as usual with `<div/>` and sub-`<div/>`s, filled with `<p/>` for
-- 
GitLab