diff --git a/ICHLL_Brenon.md b/ICHLL_Brenon.md
index 8774acb6fddb7e4a321d32000f3e0a0b9412b5de..5e4d66451a6290e4d180a089f9c1374a319734fd 100644
--- a/ICHLL_Brenon.md
+++ b/ICHLL_Brenon.md
@@ -15,10 +15,11 @@ header-includes:
 # Abstract {-}
 
 As witnesses to scientific progress, dictionaries and encyclopedias draw much
-interest from digital humanities (Roe & al. (2016), Williams (2017), Vigier &
+interest from digital humanities (Roe et al. (2016), Williams (2017), Vigier et
 al. (2019), …), which accounts for the number of projects making them available
-to the public (such as ARTFL[^ARTFL], ENCCRE[^ENCCRE], COLLEX-LGE[^LGE] and NENUFAR[^NENUFAR]) or
-studying them in diachrony (such as BASNUM[^BASNUM] and GEODE[^GEODE])
+to the public (such as ARTFL[^ARTFL], ENCCRE[^ENCCRE], COLLEX-LGE[^LGE] and
+NENUFAR[^NENUFAR]) or studying them in diachrony (such as BASNUM[^BASNUM] and
+GEODE[^GEODE]).
 
 [^ARTFL]: [http://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/](http://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/)
 [^ENCCRE]: [http://enccre.academie-sciences.fr/encyclopedie/](http://enccre.academie-sciences.fr/encyclopedie/)
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ mere self-doubt that their authors should not generalise to mankind, then leaves
 the main point to a latin quote by chancelor Bacon, who argues that a
 collaborative work can achieve much more than any talented man could: what could
 possibly not be within reach of a single man, within a single lifetime may be
-achieved by a common effort throughout generations.
+achieved by a common effort throughout generations (Lojkine, 2013).
 
 History hints that Diderot's opponents took his defense of the feasability of
 the project quite seriously, considering the fact that they got the
@@ -438,15 +439,16 @@ tool for what we need is found in the `<usg/>` element used with a specific
 documentation encode subject indicators very similar to the ones found in
 encyclopedias within this element, but the match is not perfect either: all
 appear within one of multiple senses, as if to clarify each context in which the
-word can be used, as expected from the element's name, "usage". In encyclopedias,
-if the domain indicator does in certain cases help to distinguish between
-several entries sharing the same headword, the concept itself has evolved beyond
-this mere distinction. Looking back at the *Encyclopédie*, the adjective
-*raisonné* in the rest of the title directly introduces a notion of structure
-that links back to the "Systême figuré des connoissances humaines". The authors
-have devised a branching system to classify all knowledge, and the occurrence at
-the beginning of articles, more than a tool to clear up possible ambiguities also
-points the reader to the correct place in this mind map.
+word can be used, as expected from the element's name, "usage". In
+encyclopedias, if the domain indicator does in certain cases help to distinguish
+between several entries sharing the same headword, the concept itself has
+evolved beyond this mere distinction. Looking back at the *Encyclopédie*, the
+adjective *raisonné* in the rest of the title directly introduces a notion of
+structure that links back to the "Systême figuré des connoissances humaines"
+(Blanchard et al., 2002). The authors have devised a branching system to
+classify all knowledge, and the occurrence at the beginning of articles, more
+than a tool to clear up possible ambiguities also points the reader to the
+correct place in this mind map.
 
 !["Systême figuré des connoissances humaines", the taxonomy at the heart of the Encyclopédie](ressources/arbre.png){width=200px}
 
@@ -868,18 +870,32 @@ stop being maintained.
 
 # Conclusion {-}
 
-- Dictionaries and encyclopedias are different
-- The *dictionaries* module is inadequate
-- We provide an encoding
-
-Despite long discussions and interesting proposals each with strong arguments both in
-favour of and against them, no consensus could be reached. For one part, each
-projects have specific constraints depending on the type of study it intends to
-carry, the volume of text, or the condition of the physical source documents.
-
-Beyond the technical need for encodings generic enough to share the corpora
-within the community and compare the results accross various projects, the above
-results highlights one aspect of a well-known fact within the community of
-lexicography: encyclopedias and dictionaries differ on several key aspects
+Though they are very close genres and share a common history, we have evidenced
+key aspects on which dictionaries and encyclopedias differ. Not only do entries
+tend to be longer in encyclopedias, they often have a deeper structure too.
+Their purpose also departs from the purpose of dictionaries from their
+inception, and, as anticipated by their pioneers, results in a different form of
+discourse.
+
+The structure of the XML-TEI *dictionaries* module reflects the assumptions made
+by the eponymous genre and does not appear to be flexible enough to accomodate
+encyclopedias. Forcing its use to some encyclopedic articles would breach the
+semantics of some elements or require the encoder to break the rules of the
+consortium's schema which we think would result in a less reusable encoding in
+opposition to the FAIR principles.
+
+We have devised and presented an encoding scheme which fully complies with
+XML-TEI while being able to represent the content of encyclopedias in all their
+complexity. A first implementation of this encoding, incomplete as it may be,
+demonstrates its practical usefulness.
 
 # Bibliography {-}
+
+- Bohbot, H., Frontini, F., Luxardo, G., Khemakhem, M. & Romary, L. (2018). Presenting the Nénufar Project: a Diachronic Digital Edition of the Petit Larousse Illustré. *GLOBALEX2018 - Globalex workshop at LREC2018, May 2018, Miyazaki, Japan.*
+- Jacquet-Pfau, C. (2015). Élaboration et destinée d’une encyclopédie à la fin du XIXe siècle: les trente-et-un volumes de La Grande Encyclopédie. Inventaire raisonné des sciences, des lettres et des arts par une Société de savants et de gens de lettres (1885-1902). In *Éla, Études de linguistique appliquée 177* (pp. 85-100).
+- Roe, G., Gladstone, C. & Morrissey, R. (2016). Discourses and Disciplines in the Enlightenment: Topic Modeling the French Encyclopédie. In *Frontiers in Digital Humanities 2*
+- Vigier, D., Moncla, L., Joliveau, T., Mcdonough K. & Brenon. A. (2019). GeoDISCO: Encyclopedic Geographical Discourse in France from the Enlightenment to Wikipedia. In *GIR'19, 13th International Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval*, Nov 2019, Lyon, France.
+- Williams, G. (2017). Mapping a dictionary: Using Atlas ti and XML to analyse a late XVIIth century dictionary. In *RiCOGNIZIONI. Rivista di Lingue e Letterature straniere e Culture moderne, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 7* (pp. 161-180), june 2017. ISSN 2384-8987. [http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/ricognizioni/article/download/2104/2024](http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/ricognizioni/article/download/2104/2024)
+- Blanchard, G. & Olsen, M. (2002). Le système de renvoi dans l’Encyclopédie: Une cartographie des structures de connaissances au XVIIIe siècle. In *Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie.* [http://journals.openedition.org/rde/122](http://journals.openedition.org/rde/122)
+- Lojkine, S. (2013). « Et l'auteur anonyme n'est pas un lâche… » Diderot, l'engagement sans le nom. In *Littératures classiques, 80*, (pp. 249-263). [https://doi.org/10.3917/licla.080.0249](https://doi.org/10.3917/licla.080.0249)
+- Moureau, F. (2001). *Le Roman vrai de l’Encyclopédie*. Paris, Gallimard. (pp. 124-129).