diff --git a/OpenQuestions.md b/OpenQuestions.md
index 10c5fbd403ebc60b1eaa9ed09477277913061dc7..f98d8d96564d914b847906b27d9a339d15975637 100644
--- a/OpenQuestions.md
+++ b/OpenQuestions.md
@@ -1,31 +1,31 @@
 ## For MSH: relationship between LIDA (LIris DAta) and EDP ?
 Concern: organizational simplicity and coherence bring readability to the project
-    * EBO is part of the EDP team. Yet LIRIS data is not a platform to which EDP participates. How can that work ?
-    * MSC counsels LIRIS head concerning EDP aspects. What is the exact role that MSC plays towards LIDA ?
-    * To whom does LIRIS head delegate the LIDA project management ?
-    * Why is LIRIS data platform not part of the other LIRIS platforms ?
-    * Where is the LIRIS data organization chart ?
-    * Is LIDA an object or a mission ? What is the relationship between LIDA and an "Action transverse" whose first mission would be to setup a shared platform that would realize a watch on city oriented services, technology, tools, data... ?
+  * EBO is part of the EDP team. Yet LIRIS data is not a platform to which EDP participates. How can that work ?
+  * MSC counsels LIRIS head concerning EDP aspects. What is the exact role that MSC plays towards LIDA ?
+  * To whom does LIRIS head delegate the LIDA project management ?
+  * Why is LIRIS data platform not part of the other LIRIS platforms ?
+  * Where is the LIRIS data organization chart ?
+  * Is LIDA an object or a mission ? What is the relationship between LIDA and an "Action transverse" whose first mission would be to setup a shared platform that would realize a watch on city oriented services, technology, tools, data... ?
 
 ## What are the human resources ?
 Concern: manpower is key. A team must be constituted and seeking benevolent contributors is the french academia free association way of doing things. Such benevolent might have different types of [ROI](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_on_investment) that must be met (which folds back to describing their needs i.e. what they expect). Hence establishing the list of the contributors and their expectancy is a must for the "contract" effectiveness:
-    * On the ITA side of the force:
-      * YPE is off LIDA to sysadmin and won't contribute anymore
-      * …?
-    * On the researchers side of the force:  \\ Bellow is the list of the participants to LIDA V1 that helped in defining the needs. Are they still "benevolent" or charged of anything ?
-      * [Sylvie Servigne](http://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=15) [BD](http://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=61)
-      * [Pierre Antoine Champin](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-antoine.champin/en/) [TWEAK](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes/?id=75)
-      * [Pierre Edouard Portier](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-edouard.portier/) DRIM
-      * |Mickael Mrissa](https://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=1708) |SOC]https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=62)
-      * Julien Milles left LIRIS
+* On the ITA side of the force:
+  * YPE is off LIDA to sysadmin and won't contribute anymore
+  * …?
+* On the researchers side of the force:  \\ Bellow is the list of the participants to LIDA V1 that helped in defining the needs. Are they still "benevolent" or charged of anything ?
+  * [Sylvie Servigne](http://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=15) [BD](http://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=61)
+  * [Pierre Antoine Champin](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-antoine.champin/en/) [TWEAK](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes/?id=75)
+  * [Pierre Edouard Portier](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-edouard.portier/) DRIM
+  * |Mickael Mrissa](https://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=1708) |SOC]https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=62)
+  * Julien Milles left LIRIS
 
 ## Who are the LIDA users
 Concern: LIDA start with very limited resources and there are many platforms/teams to satisfy. A "strategic", thus political, choice of resource allocation must be made.
-    * Shouldn't we formulate the needs in terms of [software platforms](https://liris.cnrs.fr/plateformes-en) as opposed to research teams ?
-    * Where is the teams/platforms need stated ? What are their current demand ?
-    * For MSH: Which teams/platforms needs should be addressed ?
-      * LIDA V1 initially targeted [Data Pole](https://liris.cnrs.fr/axes?id=68) and namely BD, DM2L and GOAL. Are these still the official "guilty parties"?
-      * The [PLEID]http://liris.cnrs.fr/pleiad/) platform already has some support from a private company. Will the LIRIS further contribute to this software platform ?
+  * Shouldn't we formulate the needs in terms of [software platforms](https://liris.cnrs.fr/plateformes-en) as opposed to research teams ?
+  * Where is the teams/platforms need stated ? What are their current demand ?
+  * For MSH: Which teams/platforms needs should be addressed ?
+     * LIDA V1 initially targeted [Data Pole](https://liris.cnrs.fr/axes?id=68) and namely BD, DM2L and GOAL. Are these still the official "guilty parties"?
+     * The [PLEID]http://liris.cnrs.fr/pleiad/) platform already has some support from a private company. Will the LIRIS further contribute to this software platform ?
 
 ## What is the LIDA mission statement
 Concern: LIDA' objective is to satisfy research needs as opposed to be a resource provider. A clear mission statement would avoid LIDA being conceived as a storage provider (without pointing fingers [storing video](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=48) require lots of disks) but as a platform/research enabler.