From 068b1bc44adab59000b778f00b18e5733a021713 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: EricBoix <eric.boix@insa-lyon.fr> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:23:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Indent fixes --- OpenQuestions.md | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/OpenQuestions.md b/OpenQuestions.md index 10c5fbd..f98d8d9 100644 --- a/OpenQuestions.md +++ b/OpenQuestions.md @@ -1,31 +1,31 @@ ## For MSH: relationship between LIDA (LIris DAta) and EDP ? Concern: organizational simplicity and coherence bring readability to the project - * EBO is part of the EDP team. Yet LIRIS data is not a platform to which EDP participates. How can that work ? - * MSC counsels LIRIS head concerning EDP aspects. What is the exact role that MSC plays towards LIDA ? - * To whom does LIRIS head delegate the LIDA project management ? - * Why is LIRIS data platform not part of the other LIRIS platforms ? - * Where is the LIRIS data organization chart ? - * Is LIDA an object or a mission ? What is the relationship between LIDA and an "Action transverse" whose first mission would be to setup a shared platform that would realize a watch on city oriented services, technology, tools, data... ? + * EBO is part of the EDP team. Yet LIRIS data is not a platform to which EDP participates. How can that work ? + * MSC counsels LIRIS head concerning EDP aspects. What is the exact role that MSC plays towards LIDA ? + * To whom does LIRIS head delegate the LIDA project management ? + * Why is LIRIS data platform not part of the other LIRIS platforms ? + * Where is the LIRIS data organization chart ? + * Is LIDA an object or a mission ? What is the relationship between LIDA and an "Action transverse" whose first mission would be to setup a shared platform that would realize a watch on city oriented services, technology, tools, data... ? ## What are the human resources ? Concern: manpower is key. A team must be constituted and seeking benevolent contributors is the french academia free association way of doing things. Such benevolent might have different types of [ROI](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_on_investment) that must be met (which folds back to describing their needs i.e. what they expect). Hence establishing the list of the contributors and their expectancy is a must for the "contract" effectiveness: - * On the ITA side of the force: - * YPE is off LIDA to sysadmin and won't contribute anymore - * …? - * On the researchers side of the force: \\ Bellow is the list of the participants to LIDA V1 that helped in defining the needs. Are they still "benevolent" or charged of anything ? - * [Sylvie Servigne](http://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=15) [BD](http://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=61) - * [Pierre Antoine Champin](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-antoine.champin/en/) [TWEAK](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes/?id=75) - * [Pierre Edouard Portier](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-edouard.portier/) DRIM - * |Mickael Mrissa](https://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=1708) |SOC]https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=62) - * Julien Milles left LIRIS +* On the ITA side of the force: + * YPE is off LIDA to sysadmin and won't contribute anymore + * …? +* On the researchers side of the force: \\ Bellow is the list of the participants to LIDA V1 that helped in defining the needs. Are they still "benevolent" or charged of anything ? + * [Sylvie Servigne](http://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=15) [BD](http://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=61) + * [Pierre Antoine Champin](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-antoine.champin/en/) [TWEAK](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes/?id=75) + * [Pierre Edouard Portier](http://liris.cnrs.fr/pierre-edouard.portier/) DRIM + * |Mickael Mrissa](https://liris.cnrs.fr/membres/?id=1708) |SOC]https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=62) + * Julien Milles left LIRIS ## Who are the LIDA users Concern: LIDA start with very limited resources and there are many platforms/teams to satisfy. A "strategic", thus political, choice of resource allocation must be made. - * Shouldn't we formulate the needs in terms of [software platforms](https://liris.cnrs.fr/plateformes-en) as opposed to research teams ? - * Where is the teams/platforms need stated ? What are their current demand ? - * For MSH: Which teams/platforms needs should be addressed ? - * LIDA V1 initially targeted [Data Pole](https://liris.cnrs.fr/axes?id=68) and namely BD, DM2L and GOAL. Are these still the official "guilty parties"? - * The [PLEID]http://liris.cnrs.fr/pleiad/) platform already has some support from a private company. Will the LIRIS further contribute to this software platform ? + * Shouldn't we formulate the needs in terms of [software platforms](https://liris.cnrs.fr/plateformes-en) as opposed to research teams ? + * Where is the teams/platforms need stated ? What are their current demand ? + * For MSH: Which teams/platforms needs should be addressed ? + * LIDA V1 initially targeted [Data Pole](https://liris.cnrs.fr/axes?id=68) and namely BD, DM2L and GOAL. Are these still the official "guilty parties"? + * The [PLEID]http://liris.cnrs.fr/pleiad/) platform already has some support from a private company. Will the LIRIS further contribute to this software platform ? ## What is the LIDA mission statement Concern: LIDA' objective is to satisfy research needs as opposed to be a resource provider. A clear mission statement would avoid LIDA being conceived as a storage provider (without pointing fingers [storing video](https://liris.cnrs.fr/equipes?id=48) require lots of disks) but as a platform/research enabler. -- GitLab