diff --git a/Article/main.tex b/Article/main.tex
index 65d6a89fd97490148993c2f676c25a039ad1ac5f..95aededda784d47b8ff465ef010520d4acd9f581 100755
--- a/Article/main.tex
+++ b/Article/main.tex
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 
 %answer to review
 \definecolor{dblue}{rgb}{0.2,0.2,0.8}
+\definecolor{dblack}{rgb}{0.,0.,0.}
 \newcommand{\modifRev}[1]{{\color{dblue}{#1}}}
 %answer to review
 
diff --git a/Methode/answerToReview.tex b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
index 9b44f6ff936635525e4d2b23bef5e2609d8b1510..214d35778aa7ec4511a886ed8f5d2e823abf6e1b 100755
--- a/Methode/answerToReview.tex
+++ b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ contained in the mentioned github, and we have completed the table with
 associated results.
 In accordance to the measured standard deviations obtained on the whole
 set of 1000 randomly generated images, large variations can be observed
-in such results on individual images. \\
-The github repository ({\small{\url{https://github.com/evenp/FBSD}}})
-does not contain any more complementary test results, now on zenodo
-document, but is rather dedicated to the publication of the up-to-date
-source code.
+in such results on individual images. %\\
+%The github repository ({\small{\url{https://github.com/evenp/FBSD}}})
+%does not contain any more complementary test results, now on zenodo
+%document, but is rather dedicated to the publication of the up-to-date
+%source code.
 \end{answer}
 
 \item What is understood from the paper is the performance results presented