From 752092f7937be0c86e51acc9283ebacb28c91d7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: even <philippe.even@loria.fr>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 16:05:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Answer: github contents removed
---
Article/main.tex | 1 +
Methode/answerToReview.tex | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Article/main.tex b/Article/main.tex
index 65d6a89..95aeded 100755
--- a/Article/main.tex
+++ b/Article/main.tex
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
%answer to review
\definecolor{dblue}{rgb}{0.2,0.2,0.8}
+\definecolor{dblack}{rgb}{0.,0.,0.}
\newcommand{\modifRev}[1]{{\color{dblue}{#1}}}
%answer to review
diff --git a/Methode/answerToReview.tex b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
index 9b44f6f..214d357 100755
--- a/Methode/answerToReview.tex
+++ b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ contained in the mentioned github, and we have completed the table with
associated results.
In accordance to the measured standard deviations obtained on the whole
set of 1000 randomly generated images, large variations can be observed
-in such results on individual images. \\
-The github repository ({\small{\url{https://github.com/evenp/FBSD}}})
-does not contain any more complementary test results, now on zenodo
-document, but is rather dedicated to the publication of the up-to-date
-source code.
+in such results on individual images. %\\
+%The github repository ({\small{\url{https://github.com/evenp/FBSD}}})
+%does not contain any more complementary test results, now on zenodo
+%document, but is rather dedicated to the publication of the up-to-date
+%source code.
\end{answer}
\item What is understood from the paper is the performance results presented
--
GitLab