diff --git a/Methode/answerToReview.tex b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
index efd9721e7b0b4cd7d0f7d58fc6ee3ddb88e54a19..15dca1ff21321133ba5b7067daafa77e76ae0a65 100755
--- a/Methode/answerToReview.tex
+++ b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
@@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ Unfortunately, we have no more left space to extend Fig. 5, where images
 are already quite small.
 It would maybe be possible to add one line in the table, but the interest is
 weak in lack of the associated image. \\
-We have added all the required informations in the github, with the completed
-table.
+We have added all the required informations in the github
+(https://github.com/evenp/FBSD), with the completed
+table (T, N and L values were already available, along with mean thickness W).
 We notice that achieved values have less meaning here, because as explained
 in the paper, the lines detected by the former method are more likely to
 incorporate spurious points, that artificially grow the width and length
 values.
 \begin{todo}
-Ajouter les images et la ligne dans le github.
+Done.
 \end{todo}
 \end{answer}