From d24e88234e932e59dda435d8179350db68f8c626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: even <philippe.even@loria.fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 18:41:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Answer to missing comparison with former method
---
Methode/answerToReview.tex | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Methode/answerToReview.tex b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
index efd9721..15dca1f 100755
--- a/Methode/answerToReview.tex
+++ b/Methode/answerToReview.tex
@@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ Unfortunately, we have no more left space to extend Fig. 5, where images
are already quite small.
It would maybe be possible to add one line in the table, but the interest is
weak in lack of the associated image. \\
-We have added all the required informations in the github, with the completed
-table.
+We have added all the required informations in the github
+(https://github.com/evenp/FBSD), with the completed
+table (T, N and L values were already available, along with mean thickness W).
We notice that achieved values have less meaning here, because as explained
in the paper, the lines detected by the former method are more likely to
incorporate spurious points, that artificially grow the width and length
values.
\begin{todo}
-Ajouter les images et la ligne dans le github.
+Done.
\end{todo}
\end{answer}
--
GitLab