diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 05b5b08d484ed86499ede8f3140b567846b71280..cc92312976d4fe0501f060733322b503d4b93e85 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e). Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table: - | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 + Press&Cylinder | E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | E5 | E6 :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----: Chemical etching :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----: