diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 05b5b08d484ed86499ede8f3140b567846b71280..cc92312976d4fe0501f060733322b503d4b93e85 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses
 The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e).
 Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table:
 
- |  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
+ Press&Cylinder |  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
 :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:
 Chemical etching
 :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----: