diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 4725e37c8799cab27d39b921e12f178d3a34eaba..37cdea51d931be705ddcf40134f39fae1b1f3d25 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Regular Test Pattern Datasets
 </h1>
 <div style="text-align:center">
 <h3>
-<a href="https://liris.cnrs.fr/page-membre/iuliia-tkachenko">Iuliia Tkachenko</a>
+<a href="https://liris.cnrs.fr/page-membre/iuliia-tkachenko">Iuliia Tkachenko, </a>
 <a href="https://perso.univ-st-etienne.fr/tremeaua/">Alain Trémeau</a>
 <br>
 <br>
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses
 The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e).
 Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table:
 
-      |  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
+|  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
 :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:
 Chemical etching
 :---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----: