diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index cc92312976d4fe0501f060733322b503d4b93e85..0fcd6cbca11a234f1cd555b3038a8d0f64a96fb7 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses
 The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e).
 Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table:
 
- Press&Cylinder |  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
-:---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:
-Chemical etching
-:---: | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:
+Press&Cylinder |  E1   |  E2   |  E3   | E4    |  E5   |  E6      
+    :---:      | :---: | :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:| :----:
+|Chemical etching|
+
 P1C1s |  50   |  50   |   50  |  50   |  50   |  50 
 P2C1s |  50   |  50   |   50  |  50   |  50   |  50
 P1C2s |  50   |  50   |   50  |  50   |  50   |  50