First draft

.gitignore

+*.docx
+*.pdf

ICHLL_Brenon.md

+---
+title: The specificities of encoding encyclopedias: towards a new standard ?
+author: Alice BRENON
+---
+
+# Dictionaries and encyclopedias
+
+If the term "encyclopedia" was originally devised as a "meta-quality" to
+describe the mastery of "all" (meaning 7 classical arts) fields of knowledge.
+
+Attacked by TREVOUX in its four editions from 1721 to 1752 (1721, 1732, 1743,
+1752): qualifies the word a parody ("burlesque") + // "jack of all trades, master
+of none".
+
+The attacks aren't ignored by Diderot who acknowledges the impossibility for a
+single ordinary man but explains the trick behind the encyclopedia: a
+collaborative work accross disciplines and even generations. + Quotes Bacon, as
+philosophical caution. In that sense, they don't refer to the same concept: a
+sum of knowledge one man could possess or not vs. a collective epistemologic
+strategy. + ulterior motive of "jesuits" vs.  (Enlightenment) philosophers.
+
+The last editions from 1771, one year before the end of EDdA's edition
+mentions the projects and adds entries for two new words: the adjective
+ENCYCLOPÉDIQUE and the noun ENCYCLOPÉDISTE. It refers explicitely to Diderot &
+d'Alembert's project although anonymously.
+
+Dictionaries are from the origin of the concept books that gather and define
+words, and are as such collections of *signs*. There are "translation"
+dictionaries that define terms in one source language by means of a term in a
+destination language the reader is supposed to know
+
+The "dictionnaire" article is surprisingly small but distinguishes between
+defining "words", and defining "things" (+ third other distinction, definining
+"facts" which is associated to History).
+
+# The *dictionaries* TEI module
+
+## Content
+
+`<entry/>` 
+
+- hom
+- model.entryPart.top
+- model.global
+- model.ptrLike
+- pc
+- sense
+
+## Limits
+
+### The `<entryFree/>` option
+
+https://tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-entryFree.html
+
+- gLike
+- model.entryPart
+- model.inter
+- model.global
+- model.morphLike
+- model.phrase
+
+diff:
+
+- hom
++ gLike
+- model.entryPart.top
++ model.entryPart
++ model.inter
+- model.ptrLike
++ model.morphLike
++ model.phrase
+- pc
+- sense
+
+gLike: glyphs…
+model.entryPart: non-morphological elements like usage (<usg/>), collocation
+(<colloc/>) or <sense/>
+model.inter: inter §
+model.morphLike: morphological elements
+model.phrase: individual words or phrases (within § so still no)
+
+=> + free text, but still no structure ! (<div/>, <p/>…)
+
+# Proposals
+
+## Bend the semantics
+
+## Custom schema
+
+## The *core* module
+
+# In context
+
+## La Grande Encyclopédie
+
+## The constraint of automated processing
+
+## Our choice
+
+### Implemented
+
+### Left-overs
+
+# Conclusion
+
+Despite long discussions and interesting proposals each with strong arguments both in
+favour of and against them, no consensus could be reached. For one part, each
+projects have specific constraints depending on the type of study it intends to
+carry, the volume of text, or the condition of the physical source documents.
+
+Beyond the technical need for encodings generic enough to share the corpora
+within the community and compare the results accross various projects, the above
+results highlights one aspect of a well-known fact within the community of
+lexicography: encyclopedias and dictionaries differ on several key aspects

Makefile

+FILE_NAME = ICHLL_Brenon
+
+all: $(FILE_NAME).pdf
+
+%.pdf: %.md
+	pandoc $^ -o $@
+
+%.docx: %.md
+	pandoc $^ -o $@
+