Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
2
2019 FBSD
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
0
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
0
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Kerautret Bertrand
2019 FBSD
Commits
6aa64571
Commit
6aa64571
authored
5 years ago
by
even
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Article: old figs removed
parent
8471d851
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
22
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
Article/Fig_expe/testOutliers.txt
+0
-2
0 additions, 2 deletions
Article/Fig_expe/testOutliers.txt
Article/expeSynthese.tex
+0
-43
0 additions, 43 deletions
Article/expeSynthese.tex
with
0 additions
and
45 deletions
Article/Fig_expe/testOutliers.txt
deleted
100644 → 0
+
0
−
2
View file @
8471d851
63 97
63 88
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Article/expeSynthese.tex
deleted
100755 → 0
+
0
−
43
View file @
8471d851
The first test (
\RefFig
{
fig:synth
}
) compares the performance of both
detectors on a set of 1000 synthesized images containing 10 randomly
placed input segments with random width between 1 and 4 pixels.
Altough this perfect world context with low gradient noise tends to soften
the old detector weaknesses, the results of
\RefTab
{
tab:synth
}
show slightly
better width and angle measurements on long segments for the new detector.
The new detector generates more small segments that degrade the angle
estimations, but it produces a smaller amount of false detections and
succeeds in finding most of the input segments.
\begin{figure}
[h]
%\center
\begin{tabular}
{
c@
{
\hspace
{
0.1cm
}}
c@
{
\hspace
{
0.1cm
}}
c@
{
\hspace
{
0.1cm
}}
c@
{
\hspace
{
0.1cm
}}
c
}
\includegraphics
[width=0.19\textwidth]
{
Fig
_
synth/statsExample.png
}
&
\includegraphics
[width=0.19\textwidth]
{
Fig
_
synth/statsoldPoints.png
}
&
\includegraphics
[width=0.19\textwidth]
{
Fig
_
synth/statsoldBounds.png
}
&
\includegraphics
[width=0.19\textwidth]
{
Fig
_
synth/statsnewPoints.png
}
&
\includegraphics
[width=0.19\textwidth]
{
Fig
_
synth/statsnewBounds.png
}
\begin{picture}
(1,1)
\put
(-310,0)
{
a)
}
\put
(-240,0)
{
b)
}
\put
(-170,0)
{
c)
}
\put
(-100,0)
{
d)
}
\put
(-30,0)
{
e)
}
\end{picture}
\end{tabular}
\caption
{
Evaluation on synthesized images:
a) one of the test images,
b) output blurred segments from the old detector and
c) their enclosing digital segments,
d) output blurred segments from the new detector and
e) their enclosing digital segments.
}
\label
{
fig:synth
}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}
\centering
\input
{
Fig
_
synth/statsTable
}
\caption
{
Measured performance of both detectors on a set of synthesized images.
$
S
$
is the set of all the input segments,
$
D
$
the set of all the detected blurred segments.
}
\label
{
tab:synth
}
\end{table}
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Prev
1
2
Next
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment