Adding compTable

Article/Expe_auto/compTable.tex

+\begin{tabular}{|l||r@{$\pm$}r|r@{$\pm$}r|r@{$\pm$}r|r@{$\pm$}r|r@{$\pm$}r|}
+\hline
+Measure $M$ & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$T$ (ms)} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$C$ (\%)}
+& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$N$}
+& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$L$ (pixels)} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$L/N$ (pixels)} \\
+\hline
+LSD
+& 63.5 & 13.1 & 61.3 & 11.2
+& 536 & 194 & 17745 & 5364 & 34.6 & 8.0 \\
+ED-Lines
+& & & 64.6 & 11.1
+& 568 & 210 & 19331 & 5694 & 35.9 & 8.9 \\
+CannyLines
+& 75.5 & 11.7 & 60.6 & 10.6
+& 467 & 139 & 17678 & 4419 & 39.5 & 10.2 \\
+Our detector
+& 66.6 & 14.8 & 65.8 & 9.3
+& 524 & 119 & 19210 & 3797 & 37.4 & 5.9 \\
+\hline
+\end{tabular}

Article/expeV2.tex

@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ on the York Urban Database \cite{DenisAl08}.}
 \end{table}
 
 Globally the performance of the new detector are pretty similar to those
-of the other ones, with seemingly a small advantage for the ground truth
-cover. CannyLines provides longer lines and LSD is faster.
+of the other ones. CannyLines provides longer lines and LSD is faster.
 But additionnaly, our detector provides an indication
 on the detected lines quality through the additional width parameter.