Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
LLM4AAMAS
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
0
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
0
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Maxime Morge
LLM4AAMAS
Commits
11a85651
Commit
11a85651
authored
1 week ago
by
Maxime Morge
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
LLM4AAMAS: Add li23etal
parent
71394b6c
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
README.md
+21
-0
21 additions, 0 deletions
README.md
with
21 additions
and
0 deletions
README.md
+
21
−
0
View file @
11a85651
...
...
@@ -394,6 +394,27 @@ produce the most successful plan and scale best to large numbers of agents.
*2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)*
, pp.
4311-4317.
This study investigates the performance of LLM-based agents in a cooperative
multi-agent text game involving Theory of Mind (ToM) inference tasks, and
compares them with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). The study
introduces a prompt-engineering approach designed to mitigate common failures
that hinder coordination among these agents. A key challenge identified is that
LLMs tend to overlook relevant information included early in the prompt,
especially when it is distant from the specific planning query. To address this,
the authors incorporate an explicit belief state into the prompt to re-emphasize
task-relevant details, thereby improving coherence and decision-making.
Furthermore, the lack of explicit belief representation often leads to
hallucinations, where agents generate inconsistent or incorrect outputs. The
proposed method improves collaboration by enabling agents to form and maintain
more accurate beliefs. Finally, the study notes that while LLM-based agents can
rapidly propagate misinformation—particularly when they struggle to track
information flow during ToM inference.
-
**[Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Collaboration via Large Language Models](https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.13)**
Huao Li, Yu Chong, Simon Stepputtis, Joseph Campbell, Dana Hughes, Charles Lewis, Katia Sycara, Kalika Bali (2023)
In
*Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)*
, Singapore, pp. 180–192.
Association for Computational Linguistics.
### Social Simulation
LLMs can simulate realistic perceptions, reasoning, and decision-making, react
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment