More typos

ICHLL_Brenon.md

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ features of a source document, the transcription of oral corpora or particular
 requirements for textual domains like poetry, or, in the case at hand,
 dictionaries. The intrinsic complexity of dictionaries has been well identified
 since the inception of the project [@tei_vault] and @ide_encoding_1995
-underlines the amount of work which went into the third version of the
+underline the amount of work which went into the third version of the
 guidelines (P3) to provide a toolbox both general and expressive enough to
 account for the variety of conventions found in dictionaries. This module has
 been successfully used to encode both historical [@williams2017; @bohbot2018]
@@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ human editing the text from a given physical copy of it), but it is
 unfortunately of no use to encode a section of an article.
 
 The first element that might at least seem acceptable is the last one,
-`<note/>`. It is meant to contain text, is about explaning something and seems
+`<note/>`. It is meant to contain text, is about explaining something and seems
 general enough (not specific to a given genre, or to the occurrence of a
 particular object on the page). Unfortunately, its semantics still seems a bit
 off compared to what is required. The documentation describes it as an