@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses
...
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ We worked with a regular test pattern $E$ (see Fig.a) printed using two presses
The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e).
The samples printed using the cylinders engraved using chemical etching (Fig.b-c) differ a lot from the samples printed using the electro-mechanically engraved cylinder (Fig.d-e).
Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table:
Additionally, we studied the impact of the printing support used, using the regular test patterns printed on: 1) thin aluminium foils - called blisters (letter 'b' in the table); and 2) thick aluminium foils - called strips (letter 's' in the table). The details about the data set used are given in the following Table:
